PLato said,"Look to the perfection of the heavens for truth," while Aristotle said "look around you at what is, if you would know the truth" To Remember: Eskesthai
I think its the Feynman approached the work of Dirac by using Feyman
diagrams to illustrate a mapping of the interactions. Now to me the
visualization techniques are much as Feynman puts it, where okay you are
an alien, how would you approach the world and you see Feynman comes up
with the method.....I think reiterating what his Father said to him.
Paul Dirac
When one is doing mathematical work, there are essentially two
different ways of thinking about the subject: the algebraic way, and the
geometric way. With the algebraic way, one is all the time writing down
equations and following rules of deduction, and interpreting these
equations to get more equations. With the geometric way, one is thinking
in terms of pictures; pictures which one imagines in space in some way,
and one just tries to get a feeling for the relationships between the
quantities occurring in those pictures. Now, a good mathematician has to
be a master of both ways of those ways of thinking, but even so, he
will have a preference for one or the other; I don't think he can avoid
it. In my own case, my own preference is especially for the geometrical
way.link is evasive http://atomicprecision.com/Topics/Pa...20Geometry.pdf
So Feynman's series sort of helps you to set your self up in such a
way in order to see that perception has to be ignited in such a way as
to ask question in a the approach he discusses.
I
always used these geometrical ideas for getting clear notions about
relationships in relativity although I didn’t refer to them in my
published works.Oral History Transcript — Dr. P. A. M. Dirac
So for Dirac to to help us understand anti-matter as symbol within
the matrices, beauty in the analytical way, also needs as good way to
visualize what he was doing. IN the same breathe Penrose uses Riemann
sphere to elucidate the geometry as a sister approach to developing his
thoughts regarding the universe. A geometrical underpinning.
[ROGER PENROSE]
"One particular thing that struck me... [LAUGHTER]...is the fact
that he found it necessary to translate all the results that he had
achieved with such methods into algebraic notation. It struck me
particularly, because remember I am told of Newton, when he wrote up his
work, it was always exactly the opposite, in that he obtained so much
of his results, so many of his results using analytical techniques and
because of the general way in which things at that time had to be
explained to people, he found it necessary to translate his results into
the language of geometry, so his contemporaries could understand him.
Well, I guess geometry… [INAUDIBLE] not quite the same topic as to
whether one thinks theoretically or analytically, algebraically perhaps.
This rule is perhaps touched upon at the beginning of Professor Dirac's
talk, and I think it is a very interesting topic."http://atomicprecision.com/Topics/Pa...20Geometry.pdf
So this is my suspicion and I am not sure many share it. It goes back
to when Penrose's talks about cohomology and he illustrates, Penrose's
triangle. How would he get anyone to see the way he does and point out
the difficulties and say, maybe you have an answer, because I do not
know? Your invited?
So you develop a model, and lets call it a virtual reality. Once you
climb on board how will your world view have changed that the things you
answer seem so different, had you not answer the question without such a
bias? A alien really, I think this was quite suggestive of Feynman to
help others see away into what he was doing.
Feynman:
‘Maxwell discussed … in terms of a model in which the vacuum was
like an elastic … what counts are the equations themselves and not the
model used to get them. We may only question whether the equations are
true or false … If we take away the model he used to build it, Maxwell’s
beautiful edifice stands…’ – Richard P. Feynman, Feynman Lectures on
Physics, v3, c18, p2.
Shut Up and Calculate, you get what was meant.
Maybe, you will invoke different models with analytical functions in
order to help you see differently, add perspectives that without
considering Feynman's approach, this advancement in thinking would not
take place. We get to these points and move the goal post(we get stuck),
in order to see where the ole timers left off, and prepares for the
next generation of thinkers? Feynman came to the realization on his own
by correlating insights over a span of hundreds of years, by himself,
not with others, so how did he do that? He is telling us. Like Penrose
is telling us, requires visualization capabilities that have already
been mapped and can be mapped to higher dimensions? What purpose to see
Adinkras that will light the way toward.....???????
Beauty is understood then, when it came to pass, Dirac's equations lead
the way, and Little did we know how Dirac actually used his perception.
It propelled him forward, as it does for Penrose, but the beauty
remains, and how far forward will somebody else with vision help us
toward the next step?
So cosmological you are looking to the past? You look up at the night sky and when were all these messages received in the classical sense but to be an observer of what happened a long time ago.
In his book Synchronicity (1952), Jung tells the following story as an example of a synchronistic event:
My example concerns a young woman patient who, in spite of efforts made
on both sides, proved to be psychologically inaccessible. The difficulty
lay in the fact that she always knew better about everything. Her
excellent education had provided her with a weapon ideally suited to
this purpose, namely a highly polished Cartesian rationalism with an
impeccably “geometrical” idea of reality. After several fruitless
attempts to sweeten her rationalism with a somewhat more human
understanding, I had to confine myself to the hope that something
unexpected and irrational would turn up, something that would burst the
intellectual retort into which she had sealed herself. Well, I was
sitting opposite her one day, with my back to the window, listening to
her flow of rhetoric. She had an impressive dream the night before, in
which someone had given her a golden scarab — a costly piece of
jewellery. While she was still telling me this dream, I heard something
behind me gently tapping on the window. I turned round and saw that it
was a fairly large flying insect that was knocking against the
window-pane from outside in the obvious effort to get into the dark
room. This seemed to me very strange. I opened the window immediately
and caught the insect in the air as it flew in. It was a scarabaeid
beetle, or common rose-chafer (Cetonia aurata), whose gold-green colour
most nearly resembles that of a golden scarab. I handed the beetle to my
patient with the words, "Here is your scarab." This experience
punctured the desired hole in her rationalism and broke the ice of her
intellectual resistance. The treatment could now be continued with
satisfactory results.[16]
and:
...events are "meaningful coincidences" if they occur with no apparent causal relationship, yet seem to be meaningfully related.
Bold and underlined added by me for emphasis.
Yes you can see how the world of the woman by an event, knocked her out of her orbit?
.......in events given by deja Vu, this is a lining up of the
information that exists in the mathematical/dream world to events as a
classical description? The causal connection can seem totally unrelated, in the case that natural world described as the classical, can intercede with the mental realm of ones thought with such precision as to its timing.
I had an event, given that I was lost in the mental realm of deep
thought, and the correlation of cognition as to an event, did happen and
materialized in that same exact moment. You have to understand that you are aware of this deeper level of action going on underneath the existence of the material world.
Immanuel Kant, in the Critique of Pure Reason, described time as an a
priori intuition that allows us (together with the other a priori
intuition, space) to comprehend sense experience.[60] With Kant, neither
space nor time are conceived as substances, but rather both are
elements of a systematic mental framework that necessarily structures
the experiences of any rational agent, or observing subject. Kant
thought of time as a fundamental part of an abstract conceptual
framework, together with space and number, within which we sequence
events, quantify their duration, and compare the motions of objects. In
this view, time does not refer to any kind of entity that "flows," that
objects "move through," or that is a "container" for events. Spatial
measurements are used to quantify the extent of and distances between
objects, and temporal measurements are used to quantify the durations of
and between events. Time was designated by Kant as the purest possible
schema of a pure concept or category. Time
If we examined the nature of time in regards to what can exist in two
places at one time what would relegated the experience so as to confirm
a connection with nature's animal with one's internal experience?
So one perceives experience in life as lining up with other people
blending with them, but the true value of the synchronize event is not
really understood this way. What is the scarab's role "as a another
group of people," following the same path way to merge with yours? Do we
say the scarab and people, are the same thing?
Now of course as I think deeper on this subject questions arise as to
how one may see the world of dream time? This is so as to suggest that
patterns are arising from a different world then the one we awaken too.
So how do such patterns in seeing allow us to see and have precognitive
events of what is to come? Just some thoughts then in regard to what
happens in a irrational state so as to suggest that quantum cognition is
operating in these areas where patterns are emerging?
Can such an allocation of the mathematical realm ensue into the world of
the classical in such a way as to describe that the mathematical world
and dream time are on the same plain? As consciousness is exploring what
affects could contain the idea of a mathematical realm distant from the
affect of emotions that hold consciousness close, and in such an inspiration state allow consciousness to move beyond the containment
aspect of a negative emotion?
So elements of the expression of the physical world are being
manipulated if I am to say, that would lead some to believe that there
is no free will, yet we live lives that are not always synchronized with
the pattern developed, so as having chosen a different Path?
Jung, in conjunction with the physicist Wolfgang Pauli, explored the
possibility that his concepts of the archetype and synchronicity might
be related to the unus mundus - the archetype being an expression of
unus mundus; synchronicity, or "meaningful coincidence", being made
possible by the fact that both the observer and connected phenomenon
ultimately stem from the same source, the unus mundus.[2]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unus_mundus
In 1952, he(Jung)published a paper "Synchronizität als ein Prinzip
akausaler Zusammenhänge" (Synchronicity – An Acausal Connecting
Principle)[4] in a volume which also contained a related study by the
physicist and Nobel laureate Wolfgang Pauli.[5]
How is causality a connect in the case of the meaning of our
experiences? The example given of the woman in OP and the scarab? Maybe,
it could be explained away as coincidence? See also : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caus...ng_(Psychology)
***
Feynman used his cognition skills to invent things that already happened
in order to develop his skill as a scientist. He had to teach himself
how discoveries were arrived at, without following the trajectory of
the discoverers. This correlation of cognition sets up his confidence
skills so as to pursue how he saw the world, and how he could simplify
the interaction of such particles, as to say, these are feynman
diagrams.
Regarding the quote of Einstein's reminded me of Dirac and what he had to say.
You can picture all the directions in Minkowski space as the points in
a three-dimensional projective space. The relationships between
vectors, null-vectors and so on - - and you get at once just the
relationships between points in a three-dimensional vector space. I
always used these geometrical ideas for getting clear notions about
relationships in relativity although I didn’t refer to them in my
published works.Oral History Transcript — Dr. P. A. M. Dirac -https://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4575_2.html
Yes I was looking into Jim Gate's Adinkras. But regarding your observations I am looking.( https://youtu.be/b6w0K5FIgsU?t=29m22s
) What beauty emerges and you understand what a story does to helping
to change perspective about a topic. That this is totally devoid of the
materialistic notion that art can bring toward our understanding of
what lies in the realm of ideas, all of a sudden blossoms on screen as
color.
Such shifts in perspective have been understood with regard to
sonification, as color. While it has a history this bend toward the
mystical, it is a valid correlation when see light as a chaldni plate
recording shape with sound. Such distinctions, in there own right serve
to illustrate a collapse of the wave function?
"When
I see equations, I see the letters in colors – I don't know why. As I'm
talking, I see vague pictures of Bessel functions from Jahnke and
Emde's book, with light-tan j's, slightly violet-bluish n's, and dark
brown x's flying around. And I wonder what the hell it must look like to
the students." Feynman, Richard. 1988. What Do You Care What Other
People Think? New York: Norton. P. 59.
So what is needed to step outside the box figuratively?? What did Jim Gates and the crew do?
So, here are nice youtube interview videos of Feynmen that you might enjoy.
Feynman: Take the world from another point of view (1/4)
The point(This is synesthesia-yes I know) is that when you look from
different perspective and remain open to information you get insights as
to the way in which the storyteller provides a new platform for you.
Same as Jim Gates and the Adinkras. You do not have to believe its real
or not but the ideas arise out of a place that we may call
irrationality, but the beauty of information does now settle into the
mind. Do you understand what I am saying....I am using synesthesia as an
example. Its not a vase, but a face. A cube, can shift your
perspective.
Cross wiring in the brain allows this attribute of synesthesia to bring a
new perspective to the reality, yet, it is still a sensual example of
our participation in the real world of senses. You have to be able to
shift perspective, to be able to garner new points of view.
This
article takes as its point of departure the view that the discovery of
the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) was not merely a
discovery of a new mathematical way of dealing with physical, and
specifically quantum, processes in nature. It was also a discovery of a
general mathematical formalism (in part discovered in mathematics itself
earlier), which, supplemented by certain additional rules, consistently
described the processing of incomplete information about certain events
and contexts in which these events occur. This article proposes a
quantum-like (QL) model of the functioning of the brain based on the
(Hilbert-space) formalism of quantum mechanics, but now used as part of a
QL mathematical model of neural processes in the brain, rather than for
describing quantum physical processes. This model is, thus,
fundamentally different from the (reductionist) quantum model of the
brain and consciousness, according to which cognition arises by virtue
of physical quantum processes in the brain.In the present view, the
brain is an advanced biological system that developed the ability to
create a QL representation of contexts, which, thus, allows one to
describe a significant part of its functioning by the QM mathematical
formalism. The possibility of such a description has nothing to do with
the constitution and workings of the brain as a quantum system (composed
of photons, electrons, protons, and so forth). The QL model offered
here is based instead on conventional neurophysiological model of the
functioning of the brain, even though the brain, the article suggests,
does use the QL rule (given by von Neumann trace formula, used in QM)
for the calculation of approximate averages for mental functions.
The QL model developed in this article has a temporal basis, based on a
(hypothetical) argument that cognitive processes are based on at least
two time scales: a (very fine) subcognitive one and a (much coarser)
cognitive one.
I see the Quantum Cognition community as being different then the one
examining quantum mechanics in biology. Remember Quantum Robin? In this
respect I may be mistaken, is where Penrose and Hameroff operate as to
identifying an operation in the biology, yet, the neurological affect
is an attribute of the erasure experiment in observation, versus not
observing. The experiment is recording whether you are aware or not.
If your animal is a scarab(not a drunk) or really a life's event is a
"collision course with an animal" at the exact same time you are
thinking about it? A collision course with the real world was inevitable
given that you were unaware of the significance of the association
between what happens in the mental realm and what is seen as
irrationality given that we can see beyond the classical modern day
experience. You are establishing patterns beyond ones everyday
association with reality in the classical way. So, what came first?
The
QL model developed in this article has a temporal basis, based on a
(hypothetical) argument that cognitive processes are based on at least
two time scales: a (very fine) subcognitive one and a (much coarser)
cognitive one.
-http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf;jsessionid=qJt9jdFI-202NxWQUAnl3qzjYQAuLs7RROnBiNiU.diva2-search1?pid=diva2%3A203825&dswid=781
Jung had already referenced the Unus Mundus, and what value a archetype, as a messenger of what is created by you to help reveal such a pattern?
This paper reports a "delayed choice quantum eraser" experiment proposed by Scully and Drühl in 1982.
The experimental results demonstrated the possibility of simultaneously
observing both particle-like and wave-like behavior of a quantum via
quantum entanglement. The which-path or both-path information of a
quantum can be erased or marked by its entangled twin even after the
registration of the quantum. -http://www.bottomlayer.com/bottom/kim-scully/kim-scully-web.htm#fig2
The understanding of the word "erasure," needs to be clarified in relation too, diagrams.
Yes,
since sub-atomic particles are actually 'probability distributions'
prior to being measured - all possible positions and states are part of
their potential until the 'collapse' of the wave function. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation -comment section of video
So consider this for example. Space time arises from a 5d world.
Unification of quantum gravity and light, allow us to have a 4
dimensional understanding of the classical world. If you assume that a
2d screen is a 5D world, then what happens behind the screen?
Similarly,
the laws of gravity and light seem totally dissimilar. They obey
different physical assumptions and different mathematics. Attempts to
splice these two forces have always failed. However, if we add one more
dimension, a fifth dimension, to the previous four dimensions of space
and time, then equations governing light and gravity appear to merge
together like two pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Light, in fact, can be
explained in the fifth dimension. In this way, we see the laws of light
and gravity become simpler in five dimensions.Kaku's preface of Hyperspace, page ix para 3
Is it a materialistic view you encounter, or perhaps a point of view
you establish by your choice of perceptible qualities that exist for you
now?? Given there is a potential for meaning, then, one "same" meaning
could not have been encountered by all, for it leaves room for
probability encounters, that reveal different views of the
world.....yet, some will get the probable meaning, as to what exactly I
am saying.
Quantum Theory, is not a materialistic point of view.
What would this look like if we were to say such traveling paths through
the cosmos were defined by the paths of least resistance versus a
probability paths. Clumping, or interference. If you understand what I
am writing then please comment. I would like my thinking to be destroyed
by your reason and your science, or you can help clear up
misconceptions that are forming wrongly as a Bad idea.
In
non-relativistic physics, the principle of least action – or, more
accurately, the principle of stationary action – is a variational
principle that, when applied to the action of a mechanical system, can
be used to obtain the equations of motion for that system by stating a
system follows the path where the average difference between the kinetic
energy and potential energy is minimized or maximized over any time
period. It is called stable if minimized. In relativity, a different
average must be minimized or maximized. The principle can be used to
derive Newtonian, Lagrangian, and Hamiltonian equations of motion. It
was historically called "least" because its solution requires finding
the path that has the least change from nearby paths.[1] Its classical
mechanics and electromagnetic expressions are a consequence of quantum
mechanics, but the stationary action method helped in the development of
quantum mechanics.-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_action
***
Maybe I should insert here how we might look at gravitational lensing
and gravitation field influences as to how that lensing can distort or
divert the photon's path.......just another way to look at the way
gravitational influences affect the photon's path.....to see that the
least resistance could as a affect not deviate speed of light in one of
those tunnels as a way in which to determine satellite travel? Should
there be a correction here?
My assumptions are generalizations, so I needed to look further to
understand this relationship in regards to abstractions and how one can
see in different ways. I wanted to see as far as I could in
correspondence with the physics, to understand what quantum theory may
mean if and when united with gravity as to a correspondence to
dimensional references.
Today, however, we do have the opportunity not only to observe
phenomena in four and higher dimensions, but we can also interact with
them. The medium for such interaction is computer graphics. Computer
graphic devices produce images on two-dimensional screens. Each point on
the screen has two real numbers as coordinates, and the computer stores
the locations of points and lists of pairs of points which are to be
connected by line segments or more complicated curves. In this way a
diagram of great complexity can be developed on the screen and saved for
later viewing or further manipulation From Flatland to Hypergraphics: Interacting with Higher Dimensions -http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~banchoff/ISR/ISR.html
The simulation argument for me needed to be understood better as
well, so the 2d screen needed for me to be further explained as pixels
are used to highlight the depth of our abstractions. Banchoff
demonstrations in terms of the geometry as an abstraction in geometry
for instance. Topology.
Similarly,
the laws of gravity and light seem totally dissimilar. They obey
different physical assumptions and different mathematics. Attempts to
splice these two forces have always failed. However, if we add one more
dimension, a fifth dimension, to the previous four dimensions of space
and time, then equations governing light and gravity appear to merge
together like two pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Light, in fact, can be
explained in the fifth dimension. In this way, we see the laws of light
and gravity become simpler in five dimensions.Kaku's preface of
Hyperspace, page ix para 3
There is then this being incompatible with each other( gravity and
Quantum Theory) that has been talked about that Einstein was after in
explaining things in terms of materialism, and to find, that Quantum
theory is not a materialist explanation. So I find Einsteins attempts
and recognition in later life as a step toward the need for such
unification.
As an example, your screen you are working on is a 2d example of a 5d
reality. Can we indeed create mathematical reality of higher
abstractions? What does that mean anyway? Thomas Banchoff demonstrates
geometrical imaging on 2d screens?
Where would these other universes be in relation to ours? Is there a way to envision it? Well, we live in three spatial dimensions: We move back and forth, up
and down, left to right. And then there's time, so that's our
four-dimensional universe. Another universe might be essentially right
next to ours by going in another direction that's not one of those four.
We might call it "another kind of sideways." See: Riddles of the
Multiverse -http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/johnson-multiverse.html
This screen has no depth other then the representations that we see
are on this screen. You can call them pixels. What does a 5d world mean?
In essence this is not about materialism anymore but a grasp for
uniting space time with quantum theory? The 2d screen is derived from a
5d reality.
The understanding then sought for is that gravity and light are
connected in a 5d world. Is a photon affected as it travels through a
gravity field? What did Einstein mean as to a slide of light?
"Yet I exist in the hope that these memoirs, in some manner, I know not
how, may find their way to the minds of humanity in Some
Dimensionality, and may stir up a race of rebels who shall refuse to be
confined to limited Dimensionality." from Flatland, by E. A. Abbott
I am assuming the neurobiology affect of quantum processes already is
an an example of the process itself, if it uses quantum mechanical
processes as interference.
Abstract:
Processes undergoing quantum mechanics, exhibit quantum interference
effects.In this case quantum probabilities result to be different from
classical probabilities because they contain an additional main point
that in fact is called the quantum interference term. We use ambiguous
figures to analyse if during perception cognition of human subjects we
have violation of the classical probability field and quantum
interference. The experiments, conducted on a group of 256 subjects,
evidence that we have such quantum effect. Therefore, mental states,
during perception cognition of ambiguous figures, follow quantum
mechanics.pg 2 -Mental states follow quantum mechanics during perception and cognition of ambiguous figures.
-
The use of eeg machinery is already established as interferences patterns, hence, brain wave patterns?
A question that may arise is, as to the definitive state of
entanglement as an ambiguous figure. While interference affects as
ambiguous perceptions, which arise as mental patterns as wave forms
prior too? Thus, the collapse of the wave function, as an entanglement.
An indication arises from quantum mechanics. Quantum theory represents
the most confirmed and celebrated theory of science. Started in 1927 by
founder fathers as Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and Pauli, it has
revolutionized our understanding of the physical reality in both
scientific and epistemological fields.pg 5
The image recognition could be characterized by synchronization of
firings in a neural network responsible for image recognition. Such a
synchronization may be conceived as a stabilization to a fixed frequency
of firings, and thus can be considered as a version of the collapse of
the wave function. pg 8
Ambiguous perception. A good example is bistable perception, which concerns alternating views of ambiguous figures, such as the Necker cube. Atmanspacher, Filk, and R€omer (2004) and Atmanspacher and Filk (2010) developed a detailed model describing a number of psychophysical features of bistable perception that have been experimentally demonstrated. In addition, Atmanspacher and Filk (2010, 2013) predicted that particular distinguished states in bistable perception may violate the temporal Bell inequalities—a litmus test for quantum behavior. Other research applying quantum theory to perception of ambiguous figures has been carried out by Conte et al. (2009).pg 9 -http://www.thedocc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/J18.-Wang-et-al-2013-quantum-cognition.pdf
The lines can change perspective and position.... as if the cube is protruding outward or inward(The
orientation of the Necker cube can also be altered by shifting the
observer's point of view. When seen from apparent above, one face tends
to be seen closer; and in contrast, when seen from a subjective
viewpoint that is below, a different face comes to the fore) as to describe it's geometric shape. Other examples here can be found(Rubin's vase -(These
types of stimuli are both interesting and useful because they provide
an excellent and intuitive demonstration of the figure–ground
distinction the brain makes during visual perception.).
The Necker cube is used in epistemology (the study of knowledge) and provides a counter-attack against naïve realism.
Naïve realism (also known as direct or common-sense realism) states
that the way we perceive the world is the way the world actually is. The
Necker cube seems to disprove this claim because we see one or the
other of two cubes, but really, there is no cube there at all: only a
two-dimensional drawing of twelve lines. We see something which is not
really there, thus (allegedly) disproving naïve realism. This criticism
of naïve realism supports representative realism. Necker cube -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necker_cube#Epistemology
Bold added to emphasize, direct and indirect
realism- a dualism I believe occurs here, points toward the foundation,
as Bohr looking at William James which lead to Heisenberg Uncertainty
principal(Quantum Cognition and Bounded Rationality PG 27 to Pg
30)....and other assumptions.
There are no phenomenological experiments to suggest quantum cognition
is real other then to see how the model works in relation too, questions
and answers, or, to declare entanglement as a self evident state in my
view.
The
Necker cube is a paradigmatic example for bistable perception where
pattern reversal obeys a particular probability distribution.
Atmanspacher, Filk and Römer (2004) discussed this switching dynamics in
terms of the quantum Zeno effect where “observation” (here attending to
a percept) increases the dwell-time of an otherwise fast decaying
unobserved state. Quantum Cognition, Bistable perception
Regarding consciousness then.
For example, subjects who stare continuously at a Necker cube usually
report that they experience it "flipping" between two 3D configurations,
even though the stimulus itself remains the same.[72] The objective is
to understand the relationship between the conscious awareness of
stimuli (as indicated by verbal report) and the effects the stimuli have
on brain activity and behavior. In several paradigms, such as the
technique of response priming,.[73] the behavior of subjects is clearly influenced by stimuli for which they report no awarenessConsciousness -
Awareness as irrationality shows then, that such information as to
reaching our cognitive status as irrationality, can move to identify
with a self evident position. This may help to show the process of
inductive deductive relationship which leads to an over arching position
as to being self evident. Aristotle, did not jettison Plato.
The first, “contextuality,” is a way to understand interference effects found with inferences and decisions under conditions of uncertainty. The second, “quantum entanglement,” allows cognitive phenomena to be modelled in non-reductionist ways. Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision (PDF)
Yes contextualization matters, and it is not just the math, but avenues to understanding depth psychology. This distinction was pointed out twice on rationality with regard perception and Jung, as it was written by Blutner ( -http://www.blutner.de ) One might find some information on his personal interests that I presented as a paper written by him that might help.
I did not mention his interest to music for further research (Modelling tonal attraction: Tonal hierarchies, interval cycles, and quantum probabilities.)
I mentioned the Necker Cube for a reason. If it is not an entangle state what does contextual mean? "Spread out" as if a parable? What is the essence of the parable as it is taken to mean to you becomes the entangled state. What did you get from it? Alternating back and forth the Necker Cube becomes an example of this process to say, how one can transfer back and forth between contextualize and the entanglement.
In the present literature, there are several approaches that seek for a general justification of quantum probabilities in the context of cognitive science. For example, Kitto (2008) considers very complex systems such as the growth and evolution of natural languages and other cultural systems and argues that the description of such systems cannot be separated from their context of interaction. She argues that quantum interaction formalisms provide a natural model of these systems “because a mechanism for dealing with such contextual dependency is inbuilt into the quantum formalism itself”. Hence, the question of why quantum interaction is necessary in modelling cognitive phenomena is answered by referring to its nature as a complex epistemic system.Quantum Cognition -
It is widely accepted that consciousness or, more generally, mental activity is in some way correlated to the behavior of the material brain. Since quantum theory is the most fundamental theory of matter that is currently available, it is a legitimate question to ask whether quantum theory can help us to understand consciousness. Several programmatic approaches answering this question affirmatively, proposed in recent decades, will be surveyed. It will be pointed out that they make different epistemological assumptions, refer to different neurophysiological levels of description, and use quantum theory in different ways. For each of the approaches discussed, problematic and promising features will be equally highlighted.Quantum Approaches to Consciousness -
As related earlier, if it's not in the brain where and how is quantum theory being used?
Thinking means evaluating information or ideas rationally and logically. Jung called this a rational function, meaning that it involves decision making or judging, rather than the simple intake of information. Feeling, like thinking, is a matter of evaluating information, this time by weighing one’s overall emotional response. Sensing means what it says: getting information by means of the senses. A sensing person is good at looking and listening and generally getting to know the world. Jung called this an irrational function, meaning that it involved perception rather than judgment of information. INtuiting is a kind of perception that works outside of the usual conscious processes. It is irrational or perceptual, like sensing, but comes from the complex integration of large amounts of information, rather than simple seeing or hearing. Jung said it was like seeing around corners.4 Two qubits for C.G. Jung’s theory of personality R. Blutner, E. Hochnadel / Cognitive Systems Research 11 (2010) 243–259 (pdf)
The contextualization of this example above in quote may help to see how
Quantum Cognition is understood from my perspective. If you are aware
of such a state as INtuiting, and if irrationality is to be
discerned from such an examination, how is it possible to receive the
understanding as, "judgement and decision, and even belief, before it
is made. Before one becomes entangled? To withhold Judgement, as if to
exist in such a state, means that information, is retained, as if a
parable, and while holding the information "in that state," aware of
what can happen if you become entangled?
Fig. 1. Two pairs of opposite psychological functions: Thinking and
Feeling [rational opposites], Sensation/iNtuition [irrational opposites].
Jung takes this two-dimensional representation in order to demonstrate
the dependencies between the psychological functions. For example,
Thinking and Feeling are opposites and conflict with each other (assuming
one fixed attitude). However, their effect can be modified by using the
irrational functions (Sensation and iNtuition, respectively). The numbers
enumerate eight sectors in dependence of what are the two dominant
functions (see Table 1 and the associated text for more explanations). See Paper above for information
One has to know in advance that such a decision entangles and that the understanding of the Necker cube in advance, gives an alternating relation of the parable and entanglement, as a choice before the entanglement happens.
***
In abstraction, information is liken too, the ability to gather information. You are not making a decision other then to present the equation as a source of information. This is currently be described as the quantifiable. It is a parable of sorts, until, the equation leads to a pure state. A self evident state. Then, you are entangled.
So are people just incapable of thinking logically? Maybe. But in recent years a number of investigators have developed the view that those supposedly irrational choices merely reflect the fact that people’s brains are guided by the mathematical principles of quantum physics. Quantum math makes human irrationality more sensible
Now you must understand while this supposed question of the understanding behind a Platonist heaven has some place here in the conversation, I had been pushing forward. I am of course interested in the science, so as to understand reality. So what follows has been on the books of metaphysics for sometime it seems. I want to clarify these thoughts and ideas in context of today's science. What is truth and what is not.
This video had been cut to form "another video." It is important to see how this was done. Go to the time of the original video on display of 20:15 and see where this continues in second video.
Perception, is an interesting subject.
Yet
logically another non-dual option remains, namely virtualism, that a
mind-independent, non-physical reality outputs the physical world
by processing. In this admittedly radical view, the "ghostly" world of quantum theory is
real and the physical world is like a screen image thrown up The Virtual Reality Conjecture -http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1110/1110.3307.pdf
On page 16 of VR conjecture I noticed a link at bottom of page that lead me to a video that I thought interesting. But, at the same time, the end, was quite shocking( See: The Real Absolute Being at 20:15)
The shift over to a universal permanence by name, had me wondering how
many had jumped the gun, to have given this reality, a name? Advanced
the issue of religion, as was entitled by name to see that it occupied,
as if a place. A place in Plato's Heaven. So you choose who by name
your (Absolute Real Being), Metaphysics has then lead us to this?
But honestly, you have to see the first part up to 20:15 and especially
at 15:26 with regard to the perceived. Now, how guilty should I have
been to see that I held some similar belief, that I may refer to the
Platonist heaven as a function of the wave, now sees some Islamic
fundamentalism that takes hold. No, it does not have to go by the name
of Allah as it is spoke of by inference as that of the Holy Grail, in
original video?
So while having been deflected as to follow a link on a page, the real
issue here is what the first part of the video is speaking too. Any
problems with this to help identify the Self?
Now of course how this video was used is important. The issue of Quantum cognition is important to see some perspectives as they have been revealed as metaphysical as well an understanding that we are in need of qualifying the process of sight, as issues of Quantum Theory?
***
Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision
Much of our understanding of human thinking is based on probabilistic models. This innovative book by Jerome R. Busemeyer and Peter D. Bruza argues that, actually, the underlying mathematical structures from quantum theory provide a much better account of human thinking than traditional models. They introduce the foundations for modelling probabilistic-dynamic systems using two aspects of quantum theory. The first, “contextuality,” is a
way to understand interference effects found with inferences and decisions under conditions of uncertainty. The second, “quantum entanglement,” allows cognitive phenomena to be modelled in non-reductionist ways. Employing these principles drawn from quantum theory allows us to view human cognition and decision in a totally new light. Introducing the basic principles in an easy-to-follow way, this book does not assume a physics background or a
quantum brain and comes complete with a tutorial and fully worked-out applications in important areas of cognition and decision.Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision -
In relation to the parable and what is distinct in the parable, was an example that I thought to bring forward as I understood it. This help me to see how quantum cognition is used(contextualized and entangled") and are looked at. Without a reductionist view, entangled takes on new meaning as to make a judgement or a decision. To make a distinction, means that in the parable you have decided, while interference, is a type of wave.
The necker Cube is important here.
The Necker cube is used in epistemology (the study of knowledge) and provides a counter-attack against naïve realism. Naïve realism (also known as direct or common-sense realism) states that the way we perceive the world is the way the world actually is. The Necker cube seems to disprove this claim because we see one or the other of two cubes, but really, there is no cube there at all: only a two-dimensional drawing of twelve lines. We see something which is not really there, thus (allegedly) disproving naïve realism. This criticism of naïve realism supports representative realism. Necker cube -
Bold added to emphasize, direct and indirect realism.
Again, I am not qualified to the extent to say parable is a good example, but, I think this will help greatly to look at as an example and the Necker cube, as given in the following quotes.
The Necker cube is a paradigmatic example for bistable perception where pattern reversal obeys a particular probability distribution. Atmanspacher, Filk and Römer (2004) discussed this switching dynamics in terms of the quantum Zeno effect where “observation” (here attending to a percept) increases the dwell-time of an otherwise fast decaying unobserved state. Quantum Cognition, Bistable perception -
I think by giving examples one might understand this better, and I wonder if there are others who understand, who can help describe the physics of, in the way it was here. Quantum theory is essential here then. Judgement and decisions, are entangled states.
