Just trying to see the context of possibilities under a paradigmatic viewing of a
simulation of Space and Time.
3. Wheeler. His phrase “It from Bit” implies that at a deep level, everything is information.
“Physicists have now returned to the idea that the three-dimensional
world that surrounds us could be a three- dimensional slice of a higher
dimensional world.” (L. Randall, 2005) p52
If you probe the black hole with more energy, it just expands its
horizon to reveal no more, so what occurs below the Planck length is
unknown.
There is a Big Rip versus Big Bang as to the beginning, and at a
fundamental level the question that such a base reality had to emerge
from a quantum reality.
Quantum
Realism: Every virtual reality boots up with a first event that also
begins its space and time. In this view, the Big Bang was when our
physical universe booted up, including its space-time operating system.
Quantum realism suggests that the big bang was really the big rip.
See number 10
***
Its not really a God of the gaps but a limitation on what we can know,
so quantum realism sets in as to what the base reality arises from. Yet,
information, is being released from the black hole.
Such visualization of what is happening between a Q <-> Q measure is
a visualization of change of energy(pulling apart)as the idea of
distance requiring greater energies. Reduction-ism had run its limits in
the black hole, so what happens inside it looked at from the boundary.
Theoretical excursions from standard views do represent
paradigmatic changes regarding cognitive function, as a slip between two changes in
our thought functions(the vase) and
Kuhn is worth repeating.
But more then that, regardless of these new views, things already
existed in place for me governing sources that were attained in my own
explorations of consciousness, so these in the view of this paradigmatic
change, have new words covering what existed as experience before this
simulation hypothesis arose.....as an access too, what is believed to be
quantum realism, as an informational source. You show two medium's
using some of the changes in views. This is a method I am using as well.
So that "
one thing" is quite wide and pervasive in my opinion as to all
information existing...much like...Jung's collective
unconscious.....which settle's through the tip of the pyramid as a
inverse action of what is emergence, and as, what becomes the base
reality. A schematic transference of the idea settling into the nature
as a base of the pyramid. It would seem correlative toward Plato point
up to that one thing. Quantum realism? How ideas filter down into the
base reality.
So it really is an interactive exchange, as an inductive/deductive
approach toward reality. This is part of my discovery regarding the
geometrical underpinnings I mentioned. This development of thought is being seen as I learn of what is going on in my views of science today.
So this has become part of my work to understand how mathematics being
developed along with quantum theory is being geometrically realized, as
an excursion traveling deep into consciousness that I explored regarding
mandala interpretations of experiences attained in lucid dreaming.
Layers of interpretation.
Long before understanding and learning of Euclid, I was drawing images
of point line plane, and images developed further from this.
It was interesting to see the idea of illusion set in as what was once
seen and what is true as a picture present as part of the video
demonstration in a follow up. This somehow fits with the idea of
quantum cognition as it is seen at these subtle shifts of Paradigmatic
change in my view.
Such acceptance proliferates to a new perspective and acceptance of the
world seen as the simulation hypothesis. This to me would explain part
of one's acceptance of the hypothesis since 2009.
***
See Also:
Base Reality
