PLato said,"Look to the perfection of the heavens for truth," while Aristotle said "look around you at what is, if you would know the truth" To Remember: Eskesthai
It is important to understand the basis of examination in terms of measure, requires us in this case to be able to see in a certain spectrum.
Heisenberg originally formulated his ideas in terms of a relationship between the precision of a measurement and the disturbance it must create. Although this latter relationship is not rigorously proven, it is commonly believed (and taught) as an aspect of the broader uncertainty principle. Here, we experimentally observe a violation of Heisenberg’s “measurement-disturbance relationship”, using weak measurements to characterize a quantum system before and after it interacts with a measurement apparatus. http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.100404
The Multi-scale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz (MERA) is a tensor
network that provides an efficient way of variationally estimating the ground
state of a critical quantum system. The network geometry resembles a
discretization of spatial slices of an AdS spacetime and "geodesics" in the
MERA reproduce the Ryu-Takayanagi formula for the entanglement entropy of a
boundary region in terms of bulk properties. It has therefore been suggested
that there could be an AdS/MERA correspondence, relating states in the Hilbert
space of the boundary quantum system to ones defined on the bulk lattice. Here
we investigate this proposal and derive necessary conditions for it to apply,
using geometric features and entropy inequalities that we expect to hold in the
bulk. We show that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the MERA lattice can only describe
physics on length scales larger than the AdS radius. Further, using the
covariant entropy bound in the bulk, we show that there are no conventional
MERA parameters that completely reproduce bulk physics even on super-AdS
scales. We suggest modifications or generalizations of this kind of tensor
network that may be able to provide a more robust correspondence. See: http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.06632
I mean the deductive logic while being objective according to being logical, to get to that point of knowing, was a exploration into the way deductive logic was being used. I think deductive logic is before Aristotelian from what I understand and to get to that point is critical.
As Plato tells it, the beautiful orderliness of the universe is not only the manifestation of Intellect; it is also the model for rational souls to understand and to emulate.
Such understanding and emulation restores those souls to their original
state of excellence, a state that was lost in their embodiment. There
is, then, an explicit ethical and religious dimension to the discourse.
Plato's Timaeus -Zeyl, Donald, "Plato's Timaeus", The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
Belief and Intent are very important here as the person comes to a position of judgment. I do not need to talk about the person, their qualities as a human being other then to know that people in general what ever their profession make judgements, and these become the intent, even if they wish to connect in that moment. Why Judgement is so important as a finality to making a decision about things. This in that moment as to recognizing the intent, betrays the pursuit of what is wanted to be known, so there is this to consider.
The link to Ian I remember. Sort of brings up another point I wish to reveal in consideration of that moment. This I connected to synchronicity a long time ago, as I read Jung. As TC mentions intent is very important, and freewill in this life as the person "is" an able function while we are here. This moment is directly connected to logic and deja vu. The moment, is a parallel recognition of something forward in time, as to a recognition of the course you are following in that moment, and why you recognize it. It confirms, that you are following the correct path.
I mentioned the Park , to show that this has been with me for almost 50 years now so as to decipher the way in which I as individual could connect to the data as information from in the Larger Consciousness System( LCS.) That experience was located in the dream environment, so such a construct of images of people what ever their religion could call this philosopher a God, or, what ever their religion may be, was a time of respect in the encounter.
The point was this connection to the LCS was a method that I was able to recognize, and consequent information reveal an understanding of the point I had been referring too, after all these years. I had time then to perfect that method. While living I had no access to teachers, so I had to find the teacher in me to connect for the answers. Why I would profess that people have this ability in them to be the teacher and student at once. Why, I want to drive people to this point. It s a small moment of enlightenment if you will that had intrigue my life ever since.
Now people talk about magic, and I understand that there is this possibility that they will see something that will not follow all the rules we have come to know of in science, so this is why I engage science. Why I followed the development of quantum gravity. Go ahead quote and use any knowledgeable person you would like and you cannot change the experience( I am referring to an objective experience). A person of that ilk will know something about science that not everyone else knows. My perspective with regard to materialism was well formed before TC came along. The mystery of what is not know of consciousness, as we learn to recognize, will eventually become an ability of its use.
Newtonian
science became a central issue in the assault waged by the philosophes
in the Age of Enlightenment against a natural philosophy based on the
authority of ancient Greek or Roman naturalists or on deductive reasoning from first principles
(the method advocated by French philosopher René Descartes), rather
than on the application of mathematical reasoning to experience or
experiment. Voltaire popularised Newtonian science, including the
content of the both the Principia and the Opticks, in his Elements de la
philosophie de Newton (1738), and after about 1750 the combination of
the experimental methods exemplified by the Opticks and the mathematical
methods exemplified by the Principia were established as a unified and
comprehensive model of Newtonian science. Some of the primary adepts in
this new philosophy were such prominent figures as Benjamin Franklin,
Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier, and James Black. Reception
I find "incubation" a good term with regard to intent. Distillation, an apt term to decipher the context of one's life experience, and of the understanding emotion. Emotion, as if used in a olfactory sense, provide for the impetus for memory to be placed in existence as data. I associated the collective unconscious as a permeation of a fabric of reality as all that exists as data, as information. Water would not be understood without understand the emotive quality that one might assign to it. How fluid as a substance that flows through the body as a distillation as memory would leave nothing but the hard fact of ones experience..Ouspensky, was good and finding that point in between the moments.
After
purchasing and studying Newton's alchemical works in 1942, economist
John Maynard Keynes, for example, opined that "Newton was not the first
of the age of reason, he was the last of the magicians". Isaac Newton's occult studies
So in a sense, I may have given a glimpse of the man known as Sir Isaac Newton, as being in such a question as to understand his biology, to see that the use of distillation, was a form of deductive logic. I had come to recognize it did not lessen the ability of Sir Issac Newton to be shown as a suspected illogical side to him while he wrote his Optics, but a better understanding by him of the matters that course through him, and as matters in the earth.
Austrian-born
physicist and theoretical biologist Erwin Schrödinger, one of the
founders of quantum theory in physics, also became one of the first
scientists to suggest a study of quantum biology in his 1944 book What
Is Life?. Quantum biology
Before computers came along, we existed, and so did libraries as data banks of information, but still the cataloged data as that kind of information did not speak to what could be gained from using intent to find answers, so it had to be found somewhere.
Laboratory display of distillation: 1: A source of heat 2: Still pot 3: Still head 4: Thermometer/Boiling point temperature 5: Condenser 6: Cooling water in 7: Cooling water out 8: Distillate/receiving flask 9: Vacuum/gas inlet 10: Still receiver 11: Heat control 12: Stirrer speed control 13: Stirrer/heat plate 14: Heating (Oil/sand) bath 15: Stirring means e.g. (shown), boiling chips or mechanical stirrer 16: Cooling bath.[1]
Steam to ice, water, is a fundamental examination of states as
matter? Water, can exist in varying states. Steam, is a more rarefied
form of matter.
Thales
of Miletus (/ˈθeɪliːz/; Greek: Θαλῆς (ὁ Μιλήσιος), Thalēs; c. 624 – c.
546 BC) was a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher from Miletus in Asia Minor
and one of the Seven Sages of Greece. Many, most notably Aristotle,
regard him as the first philosopher in the Greek tradition.[1] Aristotle
reported Thales' hypothesis about the [originating principle][further
explanation needed] of nature and the nature of matter – that it was a
single material substance: water.-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thales
Water then, is the basis of information, and as Thales may have
said, such a fundamental existence to such a state of reality. I
believe information can be describe as a type of matter? Some
information is much more fluid, or, some information quite rarefied.
Some such information is quite solid in its consolidation.
One could believe that by association as an analogy of the [Dung
beetle]could have relevance here, as to how its young are placed in the
middle of a ball of elephant shit. The life of the dung beetle grows
from the center outward. In this case intent, as well as the embryo for
growth, has to have information around it in order to sustain its state
of matter. But, in essence, the state of the information, was planted
as a seed. Consolidated.
Magic by definition, as a noun.....as to influencing a course of events
supernaturally or mysteriously. If taken to mean that will by choice
can be used to determine "change," then, what is so mysterious about
the outcome?
It is a mistaken notion to me to suggest that reason destroys this
ability. This is to suggest, that such a pursuit as to access
information in a fundamental way, that opens the path way to that
information works, as if, intent is cast into the oceans of
possibilities.
Fundamentally, one has to be able to believe, and by such a process
understand that such intent, as a focus, can be sent somewhere so as to
retrieve that information. Without doing this, or believing this there
is no chance of setting up the intent to gather information. This
because information needs to be able to be accessed.
So, where is this information?
I have come to believe that information is everywhere around us. That
consciousness is quite able to access information. The difference is,
that what enters awareness first is a subjective visualization of the
information in its condition, so as to say that the data has been saved
as in the information package. That such access to that data package is a
linked by the very intent, as if to understand the focus of one's
intent, has a direct connection. So you not only have to believe it is
possible, but that you understand how it is you can use your intent to
create that link.
By analogy, I had served this example as if to say, that if you go
fishing, you cast a line into the ocean of possibilities, but on your
hook you need the bait. This so as to suggest, the information is
linked to the intent of your fishing. So you send your line deep into
the waters of possibilities, to catch fish. Fish to the degree, as to
suggest soul food, is quite different then accessing memory of a
criminal case, but the idea is there that such a link in both cases can
retrieve information.
Well most know I am a layman looking at the methods of your arguments
and understanding the Traditional versus the Modern, is a understanding
of the move from Aristotelian to Boole, as a historical sense of use of
mechanics.
I had come to know about Plato's recognition of the pyramids in Egypt,
as a pattern used in the Aristotelian Square of
Opposition......Aristotle had to have learn this method, as an
opposition too, Plato's point of views about God in Heaven, without
suggesting that the way in which things flow downward.
The Inductive-Deductive Method of Aristotelian Science
Aristotelian intuition supplies the first principles (archai)
of human knowledge: concepts, universal propositions, definitions, the
laws of logic, the primary principles of the specialized science, and
even moral concepts such as the various virtues. This is why, according
to Aristotle, intuition must be viewed as infallible. We cannot claim
that the first principles of human intelligence are dubious and then
turn around and use those principles to make authoritative claims about
the possibility (or impossibility) of knowledge. If we begin to doubt
intuition, that is, human intelligence at its most fundamental level of
operation, we will have to doubt everything else that is built upon this
universal foundation: science, philosophy, knowledge, logic, inference,
and so forth. Aristotle never tries to prove first principles. He
acknowledges that when it comes to the origins of human thought, there
is a point when one must simply stop asking questions. As he points
out, any attempt at absolute proof would lead to an infinite regress.
In his own words: “It is impossible that there should be demonstration
of absolutely everything; there would be an infinite regress, so that
there would still be no demonstration.” (Metaphysics, 1006a6ff,
Ross.) Aristotle does make arguments, for example, that meaningful
speech presupposes a logical axiom like the principle of
non-contradiction, but that is not, strictly speaking, a proof of the
principle. See:Aristotle: Logic
I will assign image symbology, as logica, grammatical, and rhetorica, to a triangle, the Square represents Earth. It is thoughts which fill my head that the liberal arts is defined when you look at the pattern, as the square of opposition, and that the peak is man's pinnacle and reach for God, and as modeled in the pyramid under this ancient schooling method.
The pyramid was a scheme for which those things which will become self
evident, that after seeing infinite regress, allows views of Gods heaven
to descend into the mind of man.
The Quadrivium is made up of the four triangles together with the
trivium, seeks man as to perfecting. Each of the four triangles,
represents aspects of perfecting when it comes to the understanding of
the proponents of the Quadrivium.
The Quadrivium is made up of the four triangles together with the trivium, seeks man as to perfecting.
The Quadrivium speak to a cyclical process as well as the developing the student toward logic, grammatical, and rhetoric.
This all belongs to Plato's Academy, but Aristotle took that pattern to the logic application, as the square of opposition, this, when Aristotle formed his own school.
***
Parsons, Terence, "The Traditional Square of Opposition", The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
URL =
.
All S are P, No S is P
All s is P is contrary to the claim NO S is P.
-----------------------
A contrary can be true as well as false.
Contraries can both be false. Contraries can't both be true.
The A and E forms entail each other's negations
Subcontrary
Some S are P, Some S are not P
--------------------------------------------
Sub contraries can't both be false. Sub contraries can both be true.
The negation of the I form entails the (unnegated) E form, and vice versa.
Contradiction-
All S are P, Some S are not P,
Some S are P, No S are P
-----------------------------------
For contradictions -Two propositions are contradictory if they cannot both be true and they cannot both be false.
Contradictory means there is exactly one truth value and if one
proposition is true the other MUST be false. If one is false the other
MUST be true. The propositions can't both be true and the propositions
can't both be false.
The A and O forms entail each other's negations, as do the E and I
forms. The negation of the A form entails the (unnegated) O form, and
vice versa; likewise for the E and I forms.
Super alteration-
Every S is P, implies Some S are P
No S is P, implies Some S are not P
--------------------------------------------
The two propositions can be true.
Sub alteration-
All S are P, Some S are P
No S are P, Some S are not P
----------------------------------
A proposition is a subaltern of another if it must be true
The A form entails the I form, and the E form entails the O form.
***
Yes....I tried to get some clarity here regard such a start, and as a
Universal. I have come to recognize, that such an association as may
be given as to the statement of I am, of God, as something "inside the
square of opposition" as it arose from the early understandings in
relation to Aristotle and Plato. This, I have come to know of them, as
expressions of the School run by Plato, and Raphael's setting of
Aristotle and Plato together under the arch in that painting called
Plato's Academy.
My distinction of intuition may be at odds with the classical
description of the Aristotelian view, as to being infallible, while my
own views were an assumption under the idea that such regressive
moments, were when we had come to a point where infinite regress can no
longer be applied, that such a step was necessary as to receiving the
idea.
With regard to the advancement of science then, and under boole, the
square of opposition changed as to being the undermined logic, as a
product of the Aristotelian school. Mathematics then underwent a change
in the modern sense as to giving up, the Platonism understanding of the
Academy of the times.
While setting up for the idea, here I was seeking to have an idea as to
descend into mind, was to me like inserting into an open space between
the neurological function, as a gap. I was pushing discreteness to find
that place in consciousness. Consciousness as a Derivative of Reductionism?
Can animals reason, yes they can, but do "ideas" settle into the
neurological gaps as they do in humans? One would have to say yes as to
the expressive state of animals as being part of God's creatures? Then,
only to the degrees with which reason can be applied to animals, that
such an idea may or may not be, evidential in the evolution of that
animal? One may then understand "the idea of a stick being used" by a monkey in the termite hill, as to arriving from somewhere?
