Like Copernicus' heliocentric theory, Newton's law of gravitation, and
Darwin's theory of evolution, non-Euclidean geometry has radically
affected science, philosophy, and religion. It is fair to say that no
more cataclysmic event has ever taken place in the history of all
thought.Saccheri's Flaw while eliminating Euclid's "Flaw" The Evolution of Non-Euclidean Geometry
The basis of any experience has it's counter part in how we have
established the lines to which we place all experiencing on? You cannot
count backward to zero(what is before zero...ummmmmm nothing), so what
takes zero's place? It would be like asking what existed before this
universe, so fundamentally they looked at issues around the false vacuum
to the true. But cosmologically they call this universe "a box," and
anything outside of it not fundamental?
Time has no independent existence apart from the order of events by which we measure it. — Albert Einstein
When does counting begin?
Discover Patterns. Fibonacci Numbers perhaps? How does that apply to the
natural world?
Any measure then, serves to activate a counting to begin? So you
choose to be discrete. Some how you cannot distance yourself from any
operation as to say the location is other then a configuration space,
and that you are operating within it?
So the question is, when do you first become aware? What is considered
outside of time, if you think that time refers too, when counting
begins? So you are in
your subjective states, whether these are real or
not remains to be seen, so how do you quantify this? Do you have a way of keeping time in the subjective world.
Abstract space(mathematics) are totally outside of time?
I guess it is sort of like asking what first cause is to imply. Yet, theoretical definition is to say that string theory pushes back time much further to such a beginning then
Steven Weinberg's first three minutes. The act in itself is related to "microseconds" when pushing back perspective, and not Weinberg's minutes
The background(WMAP)
initially is a foundation with which the universe is painted. Then you add in the
progressiveness of the parameters with which you use to define the universe?
So theoretically, you start counting when? The abstractness is contained
in the mathematical structure of the universe which has been chosen to
be perceived by observing in that abstract framework.
When you've chosen virtually reality, you have choose to model the
framework(subjective /objectively) as well? We use it to model abstract
language. Is that real?
So recap on use of measure of natural units then.
In
physics, natural units are physical units of measurement defined in
terms of universal physical constants in such a manner that some chosen
physical constants take on the numerical value of one when expressed in
terms of a particular set of natural units. Natural units are intended
to elegantly simplify particular algebraic expressions appearing in
physical law or to normalize some chosen physical quantities that are
properties of universal elementary particles and that may be reasonably
believed to be constant. However, what may be believed and forced to be
constant in one system of natural units can very well be allowed or even
assumed to vary in another natural unit system. Natural units are
natural because the origin of their definition comes only from
properties of nature and not from any human construct. Planck units are
often, without qualification, called "natural units" but are only one
system of natural units among other systems. Planck units might be
considered unique in that the set of units are not based on properties
of any prototype, object, or particle but are based only on properties
of free space.Natural units
So we have effectively run into a problem.
TWO
UNIVERSES of different dimension and obeying disparate physical laws
are rendered completely equivalent by the holographic principle.
Theorists have demonstrated this principle mathematically for a specific
type of five-dimensional spacetime ("anti–de Sitter") and its
four-dimensional boundary. In effect, the 5-D universe is recorded like a
hologram on the 4-D surface at its periphery. Superstring theory rules
in the 5-D spacetime, but a so-called conformal field theory of point
particles operates on the 4-D hologram. A black hole in the 5-D
spacetime is equivalent to hot radiation on the hologram--for example,
the hole and the radiation have the same entropy even though the
physical origin of the entropy is completely different for each case.
Although these two descriptions of the universe seem utterly unalike, no
experiment could distinguish between them, even in principle.
When you are looking out toward the universe you are looking for the
reasons as to why the universe is doing what it is doing. What is happening in one place in terms of
black hole production in the cosmos? Do these have implications, as in other cosmological sources as to imply, the universe is doing what it is doing?
See Also:
