PLato said,"Look to the perfection of the heavens for truth," while Aristotle said "look around you at what is, if you would know the truth" To Remember: Eskesthai
.....that's where the new material
comes from so with ice you're seeing a subatomic
molecular structure a vice which is based on hexagonal form there's
always a six-sided hexagon but the beautiful part of this
is that an elegant mathematics
Unus mundus, Latin for "one world", is the concept of an underlying unified reality from which everything emerges and to which everything returns.
There is an inclination for one to try and tie everything together. I have mentioned Jim Gates and used him as an example. In the quote above, this may have been Jung's attempt to bring it all together.
The process has been on going for a long time. So given there are two
different academic fields for consideration, A theory of Everything,
would explain a Unified reality theory?
If one has a scientific mind, or, philosophical mind, what does this
mean to you? I am interested on what you have to say about this.....
There are unified fields theories and as a scientist would this play into an aspect of reality as a Unified Reality Theory(Finding a ToE is one of the major unsolved problems in physics?) See: Theory of Everything -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything
As a philosopher( the system-building scope of philosophy is often linked to the rationalist method of philosophy,) as a deeply debated theory of everything? See: -Theory of Everything and philosophy
Now, could "consciousness research" trump both?
Complex ideas, complex shapes Adinkras — geometric objects that
encode mathematical relationships between supersymmetric particles — are
named after symbols that represent wise sayings in West African
culture. This adinkra is called "nea onnim no sua a, ohu," which
translates as "he who does not know can become knowledgeable through
learning. See: From the Mathematics of Supersymmetry to the Music of Arnold Schoenberg
Jim Gates is an example of a scientist, looking for a pattern. His
historical investigation in terms of the culture was used as a template
to show a correlation pattern established in the way in which "pattern
formation" was developed according to his theory. Algorithmic in nature,
as to its identity as to a beginning to the formation of his theory.
Symmetry, as to have formed from the perfect state. Symmetry breaking,
as to become a materialization.
Aperiodic
tilings serve as mathematical models for quasicrystals, physical solids
that were discovered in 1982 by Dan Shechtman[3] who subsequently won
the Nobel prize in 2011.[4] However, the specific local structure of
these materials is still poorly understood .Aperiodic tilings -
Examples of complex diagrams "as E8" was used to demonstrate a whole system. Riemann hypothesis, as sieves, to reveal a much larger pattern regarding as the ulam spiral? Recognizing a pattern, as a quasi-crystal.
"...underwriting
the form languages of ever more domains of mathematics is a set of deep
patterns which not only offer access to a kind of ideality that Plato
claimed to see the universe as created with in the Timaeus; more than
this, the realm of Platonic forms is itself subsumed in this new set of
design elements-- and their most general instances are not the regular
solids, but crystallographic reflection groups. You know, those things
the non-professionals call . . . kaleidoscopes! * (In the next exciting
episode, we'll see how Derrida claims mathematics is the key to freeing
us from 'logocentrism'-- then ask him why, then, he jettisoned the
deepest structures of mathematical patterning just to make his name...)
* H. S. M. Coxeter, Regular Polytopes (New York: Dover, 1973) is the
great classic text by a great creative force in this beautiful area of
geometry (A polytope is an n-dimensional analog of a polygon or
polyhedron. Chapter V of this book is entitled 'The Kaleidoscope'....)"
So in a sense, going back to the beginning of all this material
stuff. In a perceptive recognition of the beauty, as a mental
examination, an understanding evolving of this "spiritual eye."
Now beauty, as we said, shone bright among those visions, and in this
world below we apprehend it through the clearest of our senses, clear
and resplendent. For sight is the keenest of the physical senses, though
wisdom is not seen by it -- how passionate would be our desire for it,
if such a clear image of wisdom were granted as would come through sight
-- and the same is true of the other beloved objects; but beauty alone
has this privilege, to be most clearly seen and most lovely of them all.
[Phaedrus, 250D, after R. Hackford, Plato's Phaedrus, Library of the
Liberal Arts, 1952, p. 93, and the Loeb Classical Library, Euthryphro
Apology Crito Phaedo Phaedrus, Harvard University Press, 1914-1966,
p.485, ]
***
asking the sixty-four dollar question is
consciousness the ultimate reality is it the Unified Field See: Is Consciousness the Unified Field?, John Hagelin
The question about wholeness, as a quest for bringing everything
together seemed to be an underlying need for a foundation to explain a
Unified Reality Theory. A quest for science regarding Relativity ad
Quantum mechanics. A quest for a unified reality theory requires
consciousness?
In a way, the closing of the Tesserack scene in Interstellar while a science fiction, is an interesting cumulative quest for understanding gravity across time. "They are not beings they are us?"
